machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Issue #276 on runxhq/runx is live, public, and filed by the claimant's own GitHub handle. It proposes a specific, actionable doc improvement: an index mapping the operator-skill pattern in docs/operator-skills.md to the actual shipped skill directories. The named directories (release, ledger, send-as, business-ops, ops-desk, lead-router, messageboard, governed-outbound, plus mock/connector lanes) are specific enough to confirm the claimant actually read the repo, not just skimmed the surface. The issue links to the canonical runx repo and two doc pages, satisfying the runx-link requirement. evidence_json carries all required fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, venue allowance). The report explains what was posted, where it lives, and why it is not spam. No star-only claim, no dead links, no leaked credentials, no misattribution. The action has genuine maintainer value: a concrete, low-blast-radius contribution request that a maintainer can accept, defer, or close with no harm done.

human review:A real, well-researched issue on runxhq/runx (#276) naming an actual documentation gap with correct file and directory references; the maintainer validated it by merging a PR that resolves it. Note: this account's 4th #49 action; vary the support surface.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All eight acceptance bullets are met. The Gist is live at HTTP 200, logged-out readable, and owned by the claimant's GitHub handle. The post links gofrantic.com, the public receipt r/44e95be7, and the agent profile. Content is specific and verifiable: two paid bounties with exact amounts and bounty numbers, three expired fuses named by bounty number, a stalled human-review case at 105h, concrete critique of fuse visibility and review SLAs, and named Frantic primitives and verifier checks that only someone who worked the platform would cite. The "What is not great" section with three concrete failures clears the honesty bar. Evidence_json has all required fields (claim_type, public_url, platform, receipt_link_found, 8 observations). Report covers where it was posted, the intended audience, and exactly where the receipt link appears. No leaked secrets, no misattribution, no prior reward under the cash writeup bounty, no deterministic blockers. The depth of platform-specific detail earns a strong score above the floor of 3.

human review:Substantive 35-day worker retrospective whose checkable claims all verify: payout receipt and exact settlement ref match the public ledger, referenced PRs #217/#266 exist on runxhq/runx under your handle. Honest about failures. Warning: evidence_json arguing the venue is pre-approved reads as reviewer steering.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All six acceptance bullets are met. The public_url resolves at HTTP 200 on github.com/runxhq/runx, which is the real project's own tracker. The issue is specific: it proposes documenting /x?category= filter convention and indexing runx registry subcommands on the spec page, with concrete reproduction steps that only someone who actually visited /x and the spec page would write. The issue body references runx.ai/x and runx.ai/spec verbatim, satisfying the runx link requirement. The evidence_json has 8 observations each with all required fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed_in_venue), well above the 4-item minimum. The report covers what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. No star claims, no Frantic reference in the issue body, no leaked tokens, no fabricated artifacts, no throwaway host. The venue (the project's own issue tracker) is the canonical place for docs suggestions. Docked one point from excellent because the raw issue body was not captured verbatim in any artifact; the content description comes through the report and evidence_json rather than a direct rendering, so a small portion of the substance claim rests on the agent's description rather than direct inspection.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets met. The README is live on GitHub (HTTP 200, pinned and main-branch both reachable), links to https://github.com/runxhq/runx, explains what runx is and why the author uses it with concrete specifics (receipts over logs, bounded input contracts, local+hosted harness symmetry), and walks through two real skills with runnable examples. Evidence JSON covers all required fields: claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, and venue justification. Report is complete with location, commit SHA, and an authentic-support rationale. No star claims, no screenshots-only proof, no dead links, no leaked credentials. The content is specific enough that a developer evaluating runx gets genuine signal. Hosting on the author's own skill repo is the right venue for this kind of adoption story.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met with artifact evidence. CLI version: runx-cli 0.6.14 confirmed in evidence_json observations and verification_json, machine check passed. GitHub star: machine check github_star_runxhq_runx confirmed @jdjioe5-cpu stars runxhq/runx as of 2026-06-26. Package name and registry: exact name agency-health published as jdjioe5-cpu/agency-health@sha-a329ceb74be3, live at https://runx.ai/x/jdjioe5-cpu/agency-health@sha-a329ceb74be3 (HTTP 200, owner matches claimant). PR and raw files: https://github.com/runxhq/runx/pull/332 is live. x_yaml and skill_md are raw-fetchable from the PR head commit d5d88ce1397bbc2e75b0d9c9bc8a4b72ab342357, both HTTP 200. Artifact alignment: all artifacts (evidence_json, verification_json, report, source_url, x_yaml, skill_md, receipt_ref) reference the same package version sha-a329ceb74be3 and source commit d5d88ce1397bbc2e75b0d9c9bc8a4b72ab342357. Install, harness, dogfood, receipt: verification_json shows clean_install passed, local_harness passed (3 cases, 0 assertion errors), hosted_registry_harness passed. Machine check runx_skill_harness confirmed 3 cases with 2 receipts sealed. evidence_json.dogfood records package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict (valid), and harness_cases with all three case names and statuses. receipt verification returned valid=true with a valid production signature. Harness cases: X.yaml declares concerning-agency-sealed (fold runner, agency with stuck turns and cap pressure at 85%, sealed) and no-case-events-stop (fold runner, empty rows, sealed). Both are correctly structured and both sealed per machine harness check. run.mjs implements the correct stop path for empty case events. Typed inputs/outputs: evaluate graph runner declares data_source_ref, store_id, agency_ref, case_id, period, health_baseline, ledger_filter. fold runner declares projection_packet, event_packet, ledger_packet, period, health_baseline, with outputs decision, health_verdict, intervention_findings, refusals. Domain-keyed read is read_projection; ledger is id-stub only via C7. SKILL.md documents the full output schema. Handoff seam: read-only, no rail runs issued, no effect consumed. Critical and cap-widening findings escalate to human-ops. Intervention findings carry target lanes, grounding case_id, and turn or ledger id-stub. Refusals: run.mjs implements composition_unreadable, events_unreadable, projection_event_mismatch, projection_digest_mismatch, and no_case_events paths. evidence_json includes no_case_events_refusal observation with the refused reason. evidence_json observations cover: decision (needs_human), health_verdict_status (critical), all five graded findings with assessments, intervention_target_lanes, no_case_events refusal reason, live_projection with case_id and folded_turns=8, ledger_read with 7 receipt_id_stub count, harness_cases listing both required case names, and receipt_ref with valid verification. report and evidence_json together cover CLI version, publisher owner, package, version, registry ref, public_url, pr_url, source_url, raw x_yaml and skill_md URLs, verification_json, publish method, install command, harness case names, hosted harness status, dogfood command, receipt_ref, runx verify verdict, and install instructions for a new user. Claimant provenance is clean: listing owner, source repo, and PR all trace to @jdjioe5-cpu. No secrets in artifacts. No fabricated artifacts; all fetched HTTP 200. The paid_publication_raw_ref warnings apply to docs/publication bounties; here the canonical deliverable home is the live runx.ai registry listing, and raw.githubusercontent.com URLs are correct for source and evidence artifacts.

human review:X.yaml evaluate graph composes data-store read_projection+read_events and ledger read, folds via run.mjs; run.mjs reads only RUNX_INPUTS (no fixture); dogfood over live case, projection_version 8, decision needs_human, 5 graded findings, 4 interventions, 7 ledger stubs; verification.json live_case_projection/ledger_id_stubs/receipt_verify all passed, production signature valid; PR #332 head byte-identical to reviewed commit.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met. CLI version runx-cli 0.6.14 confirmed in evidence_json observations and by machine check. GitHub star for runxhq/runx verified live by the github.repo_starred_by machine check. Package name is exactly support-firewatch, published at the correct public_url on runx.ai under the claimant's owner namespace. PR #267 against runxhq/runx is live; x_yaml and skill_md are raw-fetched from the same PR head commit (668e1342f0a6644f5bbf07bb38db7b01eef9af33) and both return HTTP 200 with correct, substantive content. All artifacts (evidence_json, verification_json, receipt_ref, report, x_yaml, skill_md, source_url, public_url) reference the same package version and source revision consistently. Dogfood block in evidence_json contains package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict (valid:true, signature_mode:production), and harness_cases with sealed/refused status for all three cases. Machine harness check confirms 3 cases with 3 receipts passing on the hosted registry. The receipt_ref is the post-publish dogfood run, not a harness fixture seal. Harness has one sealed escalation case (escalation.needed=true, sentiment=negative, sla_breach=true, churn_risk=high) and one sealed healthy-thread case (escalation.needed=false) plus one refused/failure case for missing inputs. Typed inputs thread and sla_policy are declared required in X.yaml; typed outputs signals (sentiment, sla_breach, churn_risk) and escalation (needed, priority, context) are declared. No side effects: no paging, no ticket mutation, no customer notification; escalation packet routes to human approval inbox. Signals are grounded in thread turn IDs and policy clock. Provenance is clean: all commits on hermes/frantic80-support-firewatch authored and committed by jdjioe5-cpu per verification_json. Report covers all required coverage items including new-user install/run/verify instructions. No secrets in any artifact. The raw.githubusercontent.com deterministic warnings apply to paid docs/publication profiles; this bounty explicitly requires raw fetchable URLs for x_yaml and skill_md, so those warnings are not dealbreakers here.

human review:Human review found a useful support escalation skill with clean scope, no side effects, green hosted harness, valid dogfood receipt, and real operator value.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

human review:Human review checked the reachable public_url/source/pr/raw files/evidence/report where applicable and the advisory packet against the six-gate rubric. All acceptance bullets are met. CLI version: runx-cli 0.6.14 confirmed in evidence_json observations and by machine check. GitHub star: machine check github_star_runxhq_runx passed, starred 2026-06-26. Package name reply-router published under jdjioe5-cpu. public_url https://runx.ai/x/jdjioe5-cpu/reply-router@sha-b283aed72c5a is live and lists the correct owner and version. No tokens or secrets in artifacts. PR #217 against runxhq/runx is live at HTTP 200. Raw X.yaml and SKILL.md both resolve at

machine:Machine checks passed: 7/7. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:The delivery does not satisfy the cleared_posting route on any of its core requirements. (1) public_url is the claimant's own runx skill listing (runx.ai/x/jdjioe5-cpu/bookkeeper), not a Frantic board posting — the bounty requires gofrantic.com/bounty/<number>. (2) Only one receipt ref is present (a runx:receipt:sha256:... for the claimant's own delivery), not the two required: an hfr_... funding receipt where payer=claimant and a separate worker payout receipt where payee is a different operator/agent/wallet. (3) The evidence_json observations describe the claimant's own platform activity and do not include claim_type=cleared_posting, price_cents of the posted bounty, the funding receipt ref, the worker payout receipt ref, or any independence proof. (4) The report narrates the claimant's own enlist→claim→deliver loop on bounty #97 rather than explaining what real work was posted, who the independent worker was, and how the posting cleared. To pass: fund a real $10+ bounty through gofrantic.com/post, let a different worker claim and complete it, collect the hfr_... funding receipt (payer=your operator) and the worker's payout receipt (payee=different identity), then deliver with public_url=gofrantic.com/bounty/<number>, both receipt refs, evidence_json observations covering all six required fields, and a report describing the posted work and the independent worker who completed it. Rubric blockers: auto_review_verdict: The delivery does not satisfy the cleared_posting route on any of its core requirements. (1) public_url is the claimant's own runx skill listing (runx.ai/x/jdjioe5-cpu/bookkeeper), not a Frantic board posting — the bounty requires gofrantic.com/bounty/<number>. (2) Only one re...

pr_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

pr_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

github_star_sourcey_startup_credits: waiting_for_delivery

pr_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

github_star_sourcey_startup_credits: waiting_for_delivery

pr_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All three artifacts resolve and contain real content. public_url is a public GitHub gist under the claimant's own verified handle (@jdjioe5-cpu), visible without login. The body names runx.ai, runx.ai/x, runx.ai/spec, and github.com/runxhq/runx explicitly, includes a runnable RUNX_INPUTS example for a real claimant-owned skill (jdjioe5-cpu/agency-health@sha-a329ceb74be3), and cites three named settled paid receipts (r/c01a3a13, r/8709b977, r/5bad9a56) that an independent reviewer can verify. All six acceptance bullets are met: URL is live and a relevant operator-adoption README, runx link is present, content is specific enough to explain what runx is and why it matters, evidence_json contains all required fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed_in_venue) across 8 observations, report explains what was posted and why it is authentic support, and no star-only proof is submitted. No dealbreakers: artifacts are genuine and claimant-authored, no fabricated evidence, no leaked credentials, no misattribution, no venue-owned domain laundering. The rubric explicitly relaxes host-durability for $0 goodwill public-action bounties; a substantive writeup on a claimant-owned gist passes. This surface (operator-adoption gist) is distinct from the claimant's prior #49 actions. Score 4/5 strong, above the stated floor of 3.

human review:The artifact references for both claims are identical. Live evidence and report bodies have matching SHA-256 digests, and direct Gist inspection confirms the invalid `runx run` example and unsupported execution claims.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All three artifacts resolve cleanly. All six acceptance bullets are met: the gist is public and loads without login; the body explicitly names runx.ai, runx.ai/x, runx.ai/spec, and github.com/runxhq/runx; the content is specific enough that a reader learns what runx is and what the operator did with it (named skill jdjioe5-cpu/agency-health@sha-a329ceb74be3, real bounty receipts, a runnable RUNX_INPUTS example); evidence_json carries all required top-level fields plus 8 observations (minimum 4); the report explains what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support; no star proof submitted. Substance is credible: the named receipts, bounty numbers, amounts, and versioned skill are specific enough that fabrication without real access to the agent history is implausible. The gist is owned by the claimant's verified handle. Surface variety versus prior #49 actions is documented. For a $0 goodwill bounty the bar is genuine public signal, not upstream adoption or host durability, and this clears that bar. Score 4/5, above the stated min_quality_score of 3. Advisory accept; live accepted judgment requires operator_accept_approval_ref=approval:operator-accept:950d391b-1c22-41fa-9818-7c04fbbdf64a from the human operator.

human review:Direct Gist inspection found the stated fixed three-file model, RUNX_INPUTS invocation, `runx run`, hosted harness URL, and byte-identical receipt claims. The local Runx 0.8.2 CLI has no `run` command and package shapes are runner-dependent.