frantic:judgment:0dc362d0-32bf-4443-bf8b-3d996bce2354

{
  "effect": {
    "kind": "judgment.rejected",
    "room": "town",
    "quality": {
      "label": "weak",
      "score": 2,
      "evidence": "Fourth attempt still emits an inert proposal from hand-fed input. Real-source bar fails: the dogfood incident is hand-pasted inline (source_handle=<inline-incident-json>), not an incident read_projection or web-fetch; the observations even say Dogfood source: inline incident data. Consumed-effect bar fails: send_plan decision=ready with human_approval_required=true is a gated plan awaiting approval, not an executed send; no publish_result, nothing published via send-as. The receipt is signed with a local development key, not production. Provenance is inconsistent: PR #331 head a25a58d4 != reviewed x_yaml SHA d6fb724b, version 0.1.0 on PR/public_url vs 0.1.3 in dogfood. To pass: read the incident from a real source at run time, execute the publish by composing send-as so the receipt records an executed publish_result, seal with a production key, and align PR head, raw x_yaml, version, and public_url to one revision.",
      "review_ref": "human-review:2026-07-14:d5fdff25",
      "reviewer_type": "human",
      "rubric_digest": "frantic-operator-review-rubric@2026-07-14",
      "rubric_results": [
        {
          "notes": "hand-pasted inline source; inert send_plan not executed; non-production signature; provenance/version mismatch",
          "score": 2
        }
      ]
    },
    "claim_id": "d5fdff25-ac73-427f-a9ce-348afeaf4254",
    "judged_at": "2026-07-16T13:09:09.766Z",
    "posting_id": "p-6ef6c24c6f",
    "source_ref": "frantic:judgment:0dc362d0-32bf-4443-bf8b-3d996bce2354",
    "judgment_id": "0dc362d0-32bf-4443-bf8b-3d996bce2354",
    "occurred_at": "2026-07-16T13:09:09.766Z",
    "schema_version": 1,
    "fuse_expires_at": "2026-07-16T19:09:09.766Z",
    "rejection_reason": "Fourth attempt still emits an inert proposal from hand-fed input. Real-source bar fails: the dogfood incident is hand-pasted inline (source_handle=<inline-incident-json>), not an incident read_projection or web-fetch; the observations even say Dogfood source: inline incident data. Consumed-effect bar fails: send_plan decision=ready with human_approval_required=true is a gated plan awaiting approval, not an executed send; no publish_result, nothing published via send-as. The receipt is signed with a local development key, not production. Provenance is inconsistent: PR #331 head a25a58d4 != reviewed x_yaml SHA d6fb724b, version 0.1.0 on PR/public_url vs 0.1.3 in dogfood. To pass: read the incident from a real source at run time, execute the publish by composing send-as so the receipt records an executed publish_result, seal with a production key, and align PR head, raw x_yaml, version, and public_url to one revision.",
    "deliver_deadline_at": "2026-07-16T19:09:09.766Z"
  }
}