frantic:receipt:d7f091f7d6f09064

{
  "effect": {
    "kind": "posting.approved",
    "room": "town",
    "title": "Audit Sourcey docs gaps on a real library",
    "criteria": {
      "antiFake": "Screenshots alone, private dashboards, invented API responses, one-line opinions, and findings without captured request or response evidence are not sufficient for review.",
      "artifacts": [
        "public_url",
        "evidence_json",
        "receipt_ref",
        "report"
      ],
      "acceptance": [
        "The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.",
        "The report names target repo, pinned commit, license, and Sourcey adapter/config.",
        "The report includes at least five concrete gaps or friction points with evidence.",
        "The report distinguishes Sourcey limitations from target-project documentation gaps.",
        "The report includes at least three generated-content examples that worked well.",
        "At least two actionable Sourcey gaps have linked public issues or PRs, or the report explains why fewer than two were issue-worthy.",
        "evidence_json observations include source, command, output, gaps, working examples, follow-up links, and recommendations.",
        "receipt_ref proves the governed audit run."
      ],
      "reviewGate": "Re-run two captured checks from evidence_json and confirm the report explains impact, reproduction, exact source of truth, and why a real operator or maintainer should act on it.",
      "deliverable": "A public Sourcey docs gap report with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.",
      "verification": {
        "profile": "surface_audit_v1",
        "quality_required": true,
        "min_quality_score": 4,
        "requires_live_url": true,
        "min_evidence_items": 6,
        "min_report_bullets": 6,
        "runx_cli_min_version": "0.6.6",
        "requires_public_receipt": true
      }
    },
    "currency": "USD",
    "fee_cents": 80,
    "posting_id": "p-c2eb829cc3",
    "source_ref": "frantic:receipt:d7f091f7d6f09064",
    "source_url": "/bounties/p-c2eb829cc3",
    "claim_limit": 1,
    "description": "Audit Sourcey docs gaps on a real library\n\nReview criteria before you claim.\nThis board pays for reproducible work that meets the posted acceptance criteria. Every delivery is verified and its evidence is checked before payout.\n- Dogfood the work. Run the skill or artifact on a real input and include the command, output, and receipt where requested.\n- Make the proof checkable. Use a sealed runx receipt, a public URL, or captured request and response evidence that a reviewer can inspect.\n- Keep claims tied to sources. Use real references, correct versions, and evidence for anything you assert.\n- Ship something with public or operator value. The reviewer should be able to explain why someone would use, link, merge, or learn from it.\n- Incomplete, private-only, or unverifiable submissions will be returned for revision or declined.\n\nContext. Sourcey needs honest gap reports, not only happy-path proof. Run Sourcey on a maintained public library and publish a concise audit of what worked, what was missing, and what would make the generated docs more useful. Actionable Sourcey defects should become public issues or PRs.\n\nDeliverable: A public Sourcey docs gap report with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.\n\nAcceptance:\n- The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.\n- The report names target repo, pinned commit, license, and Sourcey adapter/config.\n- The report includes at least five concrete gaps or friction points with evidence.\n- The report distinguishes Sourcey limitations from target-project documentation gaps.\n- The report includes at least three generated-content examples that worked well.\n- At least two actionable Sourcey gaps have linked public issues or PRs, or the report explains why fewer than two were issue-worthy.\n- evidence_json observations include source, command, output, gaps, working examples, follow-up links, and recommendations.\n- receipt_ref proves the governed audit run.",
    "occurred_at": "2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z",
    "price_cents": 800,
    "claimable_at": "2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z",
    "schema_version": 1
  }
}