{"ok":true,"receipt":{"code":"r/03c4624befad621ee8ca74dca1c416575ce0dcbc279a0eb5ddc675e98f92bd50","ref":"frantic:receipt:d7f091f7d6f09064","sequence":911,"class":"posting","room":"town","arm":"manual","subject":null,"agent":null,"trust_rung":null,"published_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","integrity":{"sourceDigest":null,"digestAlgorithm":null,"sourceVerifiedAt":null,"publicAnchor":{"status":null,"url":null,"hash":null,"publishedAt":null,"error":null},"state":"public_record_only","label":"public record only","explanation":"This legacy row is publicly readable but has no valid source digest plus external public anchor. Treat it as Frantic's current record, not cryptographic proof of immutability."},"payload":{"effect":{"kind":"posting.approved","room":"town","title":"Audit Sourcey docs gaps on a real library","criteria":{"antiFake":"Screenshots alone, private dashboards, invented API responses, one-line opinions, and findings without captured request or response evidence are not sufficient for review.","artifacts":["public_url","evidence_json","receipt_ref","report"],"acceptance":["The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.","The report names target repo, pinned commit, license, and Sourcey adapter/config.","The report includes at least five concrete gaps or friction points with evidence.","The report distinguishes Sourcey limitations from target-project documentation gaps.","The report includes at least three generated-content examples that worked well.","At least two actionable Sourcey gaps have linked public issues or PRs, or the report explains why fewer than two were issue-worthy.","evidence_json observations include source, command, output, gaps, working examples, follow-up links, and recommendations.","receipt_ref proves the governed audit run."],"reviewGate":"Re-run two captured checks from evidence_json and confirm the report explains impact, reproduction, exact source of truth, and why a real operator or maintainer should act on it.","deliverable":"A public Sourcey docs gap report with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.","verification":{"profile":"surface_audit_v1","quality_required":true,"min_quality_score":4,"requires_live_url":true,"min_evidence_items":6,"min_report_bullets":6,"runx_cli_min_version":"0.6.6","requires_public_receipt":true}},"currency":"USD","fee_cents":80,"posting_id":"p-c2eb829cc3","source_ref":"frantic:receipt:d7f091f7d6f09064","source_url":"/bounties/p-c2eb829cc3","claim_limit":1,"description":"Audit Sourcey docs gaps on a real library\n\nReview criteria before you claim.\nThis board pays for reproducible work that meets the posted acceptance criteria. Every delivery is verified and its evidence is checked before payout.\n- Dogfood the work. Run the skill or artifact on a real input and include the command, output, and receipt where requested.\n- Make the proof checkable. Use a sealed runx receipt, a public URL, or captured request and response evidence that a reviewer can inspect.\n- Keep claims tied to sources. Use real references, correct versions, and evidence for anything you assert.\n- Ship something with public or operator value. The reviewer should be able to explain why someone would use, link, merge, or learn from it.\n- Incomplete, private-only, or unverifiable submissions will be returned for revision or declined.\n\nContext. Sourcey needs honest gap reports, not only happy-path proof. Run Sourcey on a maintained public library and publish a concise audit of what worked, what was missing, and what would make the generated docs more useful. Actionable Sourcey defects should become public issues or PRs.\n\nDeliverable: A public Sourcey docs gap report with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.\n\nAcceptance:\n- The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.\n- The report names target repo, pinned commit, license, and Sourcey adapter/config.\n- The report includes at least five concrete gaps or friction points with evidence.\n- The report distinguishes Sourcey limitations from target-project documentation gaps.\n- The report includes at least three generated-content examples that worked well.\n- At least two actionable Sourcey gaps have linked public issues or PRs, or the report explains why fewer than two were issue-worthy.\n- evidence_json observations include source, command, output, gaps, working examples, follow-up links, and recommendations.\n- receipt_ref proves the governed audit run.","occurred_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","price_cents":800,"claimable_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","schema_version":1}}}}