machine:Machine checks passed: 5/5. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets met. Package published as exact name `postmortem-maker` at `alexanderjiazx/postmortem-maker@sha-62ac1d14a135`; public_url on runx.ai resolves; PR #484 against runxhq/runx is live; raw x_yaml and skill_md fetch from the correct PR head commit. Local harness passed 4 cases before publish; hosted harness confirmed 4 cases, 3 receipts. Dogfood run `run_make_f4356b399b76ec9d` read a live GitHub Status incident via web_fetch at run time (not a hand-pasted fixture), sealed a publishable postmortem, and executed the sealed-outbox delivery to `outbox/postmortems/gh-status-qwdwmtqghpk5.postmortem.json` with `publish_result.executed=true` and a bound digest. Receipt verifies with valid digest, content_address, and signature. The `finalize` step is a deterministic JavaScript enforcer with a strict schema; the invented-citation case proves it refuses fabricated quotes. The conflicting-evidence case withholds the send plan correctly. Provenance chain is clean: claimant AlexanderJiazx, fork commit 1263b9a092d6fe9b32cdf95ac8c2472826a0c437, PR against runxhq/runx, registry owner matching claimant. The skill does real work: it fetches real incident data at run time and executes a governed fs.write; it is not a hand-fed pattern demo. raw.githubusercontent.com URLs for x_yaml, skill_md, evidence_json, verification_json, and report are appropriate evidence slots for a runx skill bounty and are not public-deliverable host failures here. Accept-worthy at 5/5.

machine:Machine checks passed: 1/1. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Filed a real, specific, maintainer-actionable issue on runxhq/runx (#485): `runx login --from-gh` hard-shells to `gh auth token` even when a usable token is already in `GH_TOKEN`/`GITHUB_TOKEN`, blocking agent and CI environments. Authored from an actual reproduction with a working shim, proposes a concrete fallback order. Issue loads publicly, links directly to the runx project, and has no spam or reciprocal-promotion pattern. Report is honest and specific. Machine floor clean. One structural gap: evidence_json observations are narrative strings and don't explicitly key `claim_type`, `runx_link_found`, or `audience` by name as the bounty listed. Content is present in substance but not in the exact keyed form. On a $0 goodwill bounty judged on genuineness and real content, that gap keeps this off 5 but does not block acceptance at the floor.

human review:Issue 485 authored by AlexanderJiazx (matches claimant), open; links the project; loads for a stranger; verified 2026-09-17.