This claim is closed.
review detail
machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.
auto-review:The skill built does not match the bounty specification. The bounty requires typed inputs `thread` (support thread turns) and `sla_policy`, with typed outputs `signals{sentiment, sla_breach, churn_risk}` and `escalation{needed, priority, context}`. The claimant built a queue-clustering tool: X.yaml defines `queue` as the input, the harness cases pass ticket arrays, and the logic uses Jaccard similarity on ticket subjects with union-find clustering to detect volume/severity/stale signals. That is a different skill. The typed input/output contract is wrong at the root. Specific failures by acceptance bullet: 1. Wrong typed inputs and outputs. X.yaml uses `queue`, `context`, `escalation_policy` not `thread` and `sla_policy`. The output schema is `runx.support.firewatch.v1` with `ticket_ids`, `max_severity`, `oldest_age` not `signals{sentiment, sla_breach, churn_risk}` and `escalation{needed, priority, context}`. Fix: rebuild the skill to accept `thread` (turns array) and `sla_policy` (first_response_hours, resolution_hours) and emit the specified signal and escalation objects. 2. Wrong harness second case. The bounty requires one sealed case where a breached or strongly negative thread emits `escalation.needed: true`, and one refused/no-escalation case where a healthy thread emits no escalation. The second case is `stop_empty_queue` (exit 64 on empty queue), not a healthy-thread all-clear. Fix: replace the second case with a healthy thread input that produces `escalation.needed: false`. 3. evidence_json.dogfood missing required fields. The bounty requires `{ package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, harness_cases }`. The submitted dogfood block contains only `{ input, output, receipt_id }`. Missing: `package`, `command`, `verify_verdict`, `harness_cases` (each case name with sealed/refused status). Fix: re-run the dogfood step, capture the full command, run `runx verify --receipt <receipt.json> --json`, and record all required fields. 4. evidence_json.observations does not include the runx CLI version string. The acceptance bullet requires the exact `runx --version` output (`runx-cli 0.6.16`) to appear inside `observations`. It appears only in `runx_cli_version` at the top level. Fix: add an observation item with the exact version output string. 5. Version consistency. Artifact files (x_yaml, skill_md, evidence_json) are pinned to commit `4f22134f780105252f9d4da7b5931de666521b88` but `verification_json.source_repo.commit_sha` is `29b4802ee40b207c027ad06681d54615a08a45b6`. These must all reference the same commit. Fix: align all artifacts to a single commit. 6. evidence_json.observations do not cover the full required list: publisher owner, package name, version, registry ref, public_url, pr_url, source_url, raw x_yaml and skill_md URLs, publish method, install command, hosted harness status, dogfood command, runx verify verdict, and new-user walkthrough are absent from observations. Fix: add observations covering each of these items. The core issue is the wrong skill. Redelivery requires rebuilding to the `thread` + `sla_policy` specification before the other gaps matter. Rubric blockers: auto_review_verdict: The skill built does not match the bounty specification. The bounty requires typed inputs `thread` (support thread turns) and `sla_policy`, with typed outputs `signals{sentiment, sla_breach, churn_risk}` and `escalation{needed, priority, context}`. The claimant built a queue-c...