machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All three artifacts resolved at HTTP 200. The public_url is a durable public GitHub repo containing a README that introduces Runx with specific detail: governed execution via sandboxes with spend caps and policy bounds, CLI install steps, skill lifecycle commands, and links to the official repo at github.com/runxhq/runx. evidence_json carries all required fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed) and four observations meeting the minimum. The report names what was created, where it lives, and why it is educational rather than spam. No star proof, no private links, no leaked credentials. The content is specific enough that a newcomer can understand what Runx is and how to start. Scores at floor acceptable because the README depth is adequate but not exceptional.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All three artifacts are reachable and real. The public GitHub repo contains a README guide to Runx covering governed execution, sandboxes, spend caps, CLI workflow (init, run, publish), and links to github.com/runxhq/runx and runx.ai/docs. The evidence_json carries all required fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed) with four observations. The report names what was created, where it lives, and why it is educational rather than spam. No star-only claim, no dead links, no leaked tokens. The repo is a modest but genuine public support artifact that a developer could find and learn from.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

Latest auto-review rejected the delivery: The evidence_json is missing two required fields explicitly named in acceptance bullet 4: "audience" and "why the action is allowed in that venue". The evidence_json contains claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, a...

auto-review:The evidence_json is missing two required fields explicitly named in acceptance bullet 4: "audience" and "why the action is allowed in that venue". The evidence_json contains claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, and summary, but those two fields are absent. To pass, add an "audience" field (e.g., "developers evaluating agent frameworks") and a "venue_policy" or equivalent field explaining why posting a guide on a public GitHub repo is an appropriate venue for this kind of project mention. Redeliver with an updated evidence.json that includes all six required fields. Rubric blockers: bullet_1: public_url returns HTTP 200 and is a public GitHub repo with a README guide about runx; qualifies as a relevant repo/README that mentions runx; bullet_2: evidence_json shows runx_link_found=true and observations reference https://github.com/runxhq/runx; report confirms the link; passes; bullet_3: guide covers governed execution, sandboxes, spend caps, policy bounds, CLI workflow specific to runx; a reader can understand what runx is and why it matters; bullet_4: evidence_json is missing required fields 'audience' and 'why the action is allowed in that venue'; only claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, and summary are present; bullet_5: report explains what was created, where it lives (GitHub repo URL), and argues why it is authentic support rather than link spam; bullet_6: no star-only claims or star screenshots submitted