auto-review:All three artifacts are live and reachable. The Gist is a public, durable GitHub-hosted walkthrough that names runx-specific mechanics (SKILL.md, X.yaml, fixtures, harness, receipts, verification) in enough detail that a reader can understand what runx does and why it matters. Both required links (github.com/runxhq/runx and runx.ai) appear in the Gist body. The evidence_json contains all required observation fields (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, allowed_venue). The report covers what was posted, where it lives, and why it is not spam. No star-only proof, no screenshots, no reciprocal-star asks. The content is short but accurate and specific; it clears the floor.

auto-review:All required artifacts resolve and the evidence chain is consistent throughout. Public registry URL is live at runx.ai/x/lubuseb/rfp-response@sha-68462d4db0fd with correct owner. Raw x_yaml and skill_md are fetchable from the PR head commit and complete. verification_json (HTTP 200) independently confirms receipt sha256:3a5fe208e9bc5f06920a60b1abee55d874d2e7b72b6e99ac9f3e35f17cc9a3fc as valid with production signature. evidence_json contains inline answered_count=2, gap_count=0, sample citations, harness_cases with all three case names and statuses, and receipt_id. The X.yaml declares side_effects:none, network_during_run:denied, typed runners and outputs. SKILL.md specifies typed inputs (questionnaire, knowledge_pack), typed output (answers[{q,answer,citations,confidence}], gaps[]), and read-only operation. The harness has the required sealed cited-answer case and refused gap case plus a fail-closed case. The report covers every field the bounty requires and includes reproduce commands a new user can follow. The package is installable, the dogfood produced a post-publish receipt verified in production mode, and no secrets appear in any artifact.

auto-review:The core skill is real: public_url is live, receipt verifies as production-mode, x_yaml and skill_md fetch clean from the PR head commit, the dogfood run produced a bounded least-privilege proposal with a human approval gate, and the implementation is read-only. Three explicit acceptance bullets are unmet. 1. evidence_json.dogfood is missing harness_cases. The bounty requires evidence_json.dogfood to be a structure containing { package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, harness_cases }, where harness_cases lists each case name with its sealed or refused status. The submitted dogfood block has command, receipt_ref, decision, safeguards, and verify_verdict (via runtime block) but no harness_cases array. Add "harness_cases": [{"name":"least-privilege-grant-proposal","status":"sealed"},{"name":"deny-for-disallowed-resource","status":"sealed"},{"name":"missing-justification-fails-closed","status":"refused"}] (or equivalent) to the dogfood block. 2. escalation is not declared as a typed output. The bounty requires typed output to include decision{grant,deny}, least_privilege_proposal{scopes,ttl}, and escalation. X.yaml runners.default.outputs lists decision_packet, grant_proposal, evidence_json, report. escalation is not a named output field anywhere in the skill definition. Add escalation as a typed output in both X.yaml and SKILL.md. 3. evidence_json.observations does not include a captured runx --version output entry. The bounty requires evidence_json.observations to include the exact runx --version output showing runx-cli 0.6.13 or newer. The version appears in evidence_json.runtime.runx_version but not as an observation entry with the captured command output. Add an observation entry with name "runx_version", the exact captured stdout from running the version command, and status "passed". Fix these three items and redeliver. The rest of the delivery is solid. Rubric blockers: cli_version: runx-cli 0.6.13 present in evidence_json.runtime.runx_version but not as a captured observation entry showing the --version command output; bounty requires evidence_json.observations to include the exact output; clean_install_harness_dogfood_receipt: clean install, local harness, hosted harness, dogfood, and verify all claimed and supported by observations; but evidence_json.dogfood missing required harness_cases array listing each case name with sealed/refused status; typed_inputs_outputs: inputs correct (access_request, policy, current_entitlements); outputs in X.yaml list decision_packet, grant_proposal, evidence_json, report; escalation is not declared as a typed output anywhere in skill definition; observations_decision_scopes_ttl_escalation_harness_receipt: hosted_harness observation mentions grant/deny/fail-closed cases but does not list them by name with status; observations do not include explicit escalation_path, harness case names, or receipt_id as structured observation fields

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met. CLI version is 0.7.0, clearing the 0.6.14 floor. GitHub star for runxhq/runx verified by machine check. Package name is exactly incident-commander, published via the required flow. PR 306 against runxhq/runx is live. Raw x_yaml and skill_md are fetched from the correct PR head commit SHA 4541406ca4e39ea4bcc84411b46a32ad8885b51c. All artifacts reference the same version sha-5946e4b277ad and the same source revision. Clean install confirmed, local harness passed, hosted harness passed 2/0 confirmed by machine check. Dogfood block is complete with package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, and harness_cases; verification_json shows valid: true with production signature and matching digest/content_address. Receipt is the post-publish dogfood run, not a fixture seal. Harness declares two correct cases: incident-send-awaits-then-approves (sealed, send objective with awaiting_approval then roster-matched approval advances and seals) and incident-assign-missing-owner (needs_agent with no named run, no caller.answers). Typed inputs and output match the contract. Policy declares sends_messages denied, mints_authority denied, persists_state denied; no data-store composition. SKILL.md correctly describes CAS ownership, dispatch-by-naming, approval gating, and all stop conditions. evidence_json observations cover turn status, severity, named comms run with audience and content_digest and approval principal, refusal reason, both harness case names, and receipt id. Report covers every required field including new user install/run/verify commands with no private context required. The public_url returned HTTP 500 at artifact-fetch time but the machine verifier confirmed HTTP 200 with 52KB content at check time; this is a transient server error, not a dead or fabricated surface. The skill has genuine operational value for any team running incidents on the agency spine.

human review:On the contract this passes (real enforcement logic, captured adversarial cases, production receipt), but it runs on folded input and dispatches nothing, so it is a pattern demo, not operational value. case_state and roster are hand-fed and the send-as is a non-executable handoff (sends_messages denied). To be payable as a 5/5 runx skill: resolve the send-as handoff to a real messaging skill (nitrosend or governed-outbound) so a roster-matched approval actually dispatches and links its send receipt before delivered is allowed, and source incident state from a real alert or monitor rather than folded input. Then it coordinates a real incident under governance instead of simulating one. The enforcement runner and roster logic are strong and reusable.

evidence_json_valid: waiting_for_delivery

runx_cli_version: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_items: waiting_for_delivery

artifact_summary: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

receipt_shape: waiting_for_delivery

report_depth: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_json_valid: running

evidence_items: running

evidence_summary: running

receipt_shape: running

report_depth: running

auto-review:The Sourcey docs are genuinely strong: real Sourcey 3.6.3 output covering 77 Modrinth API operations in full. The block is the host. A throwaway netlify.app preview subdomain is not a durable home we would ship from. Republish the same site at a durable URL (a custom domain or a stable host) and res