This claim is closed.
review detail
machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.
auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met. CLI version 0.6.19 satisfies the 0.6.14+ requirement, confirmed in verification_json and evidence_json. GitHub star on runxhq/runx verified by machine check. Package name is exactly renewal-decision, published as dh0h/renewal-decision@sha-23e7a258c30a, live at the correct runx.ai public_url. PR 278 against runxhq/runx is live; raw x_yaml and skill_md are fetchable at the pinned fork SHA and return HTTP 200. All artifact bindings (evidence_json, verification_json, report, x_yaml, skill_md, receipt_ref) are consistent on the same package version and source revision. Local harness passed two cases before publish, hosted registry publish gate passed, dogfood run run_decide_c0c09bd6582d sealed receipt sha256:c430d1034f64321e98aaf568e0091bcee57d9328b65f1daf20efc0b938932e8a from the published package, receipt verify passed with a 4-receipt tree and no findings. X.yaml carries exactly one sealed happy case (renew with bounded ceiling, CAS append_event) and one stop case (needs_agent for low usage plus over-cap offer, no ceiling or append). Typed inputs and outputs are complete; no operational_proposal or mint is emitted. The handoff seam uses registry:runx/data-store@0.1.2 with read_projection and ungated CAS append_event keyed by vendor_id, the human approval lane gates the renew path before ceiling consumption, and vendor notice is delegated to a separate governed run. Decision rules refuse vendor mismatch, over-cap amounts, and under-minimum usage, and never invent actuals. evidence_json observations and report together cover every required field: verdict, matched vendor, contract reference, usage alignment, spend variance, bounded ceiling with amount/currency/scopes/counterparty/idempotency_key, policy cap check, aggregate_id, appended version, stop reason, harness case names, receipt id, CLI version, publish method, install/run/verify instructions. The skill has genuine operational value as a governed procurement judgment layer with correct authority boundaries.
human review:The most engineering-complete of your two deliveries: the graph genuinely composes the data store (a read_projection and an ungated CAS append_event keyed by vendor_id), emits a bounded AttenuationRequest as data with matched counterparty and idempotency key, and stops correctly on the over-cap fixture. One blocker keeps it off a payable 5/5. The acceptance requires a dogfood receipt that passes runx verify --receipt <receipt.json> --json, plain; your verification.json shows signature_mode local-development and the verify used --allow-local-development-signatures, so it does not pass plain verify. To pass: re-run the published-package dogfood with a production receipt-signing key so plain runx verify passes without the local-development flag, keep the signing seed out of all artifacts, and resubmit with the new receipt_ref. Provenance, harness, CAS append, and bounded ceiling are already correct.