machine:Machine checks passed: 8/8. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All six acceptance bullets are met with specific evidence in the artifacts. CLI version: runx-cli 0.7.0 confirmed in observations. Real recurring ops need: the claimant's own two-week USD 100 bounty-income settlement objective, explained as recurring because marketplace inventory, claim capacity, and settlement receipts change over the window. Agency opened with catalog skills runx/agency@sha-1cc86871fbb2 and runx/ops-desk@sha-662dfad394ad under a three-role roster with scoped permissions. Four governed turns present, each with a distinct receipt ref and verify_valid: true, in turn order, exceeding the three-turn minimum. Two consequence gates fired and resolved: turn 3 hit awaiting_approval for public_send_without_bounded_approval and the gate-resolution entry shows it bound to the specific repo with USD 0 spend and no wallet change; turn 5 hit a second awaiting_approval for the Frantic claim with its own gate resolution. Secrets redacted (no signing material, tokens, or keys visible), receipt ids and turn numbers intact throughout. Report names three concrete governance moments - pending money stayed at USD 0 rather than miscounted as earned, the roster blocked the auditor from publishing or claiming, and approval narrowed the blast radius to one named repo before any public mutation - all three visible in the evidence trail. evidence_json includes mandate, roster, case_id, per-turn receipt refs with verify_valid, and the top-level receipt_ref. The public_url at github.com/q10283245/renewal-agency-case-trail is live and claimant-owned (handle matches), serving as the durable home; raw files are evidence within that repo. Raw host warnings are not dealbreakers here. Work is genuine, substantive, and has real operational proof value for the runx ecosystem.

human review:runx verify re-run on receipts 08a6e412, 73ffb33b, dd906b52, b3ac4927, aff95e92, 8f6f8f12, 44be7ffe, f7f331de, 7ce8793d: all valid, findings 0, against the published public key; receipt graph shape matches the catalog agency and ops-desk skills; prod DB confirms the USD 21 pending income observation and the turn-5 bounty-104 claim timing; evidence.json and report at commit 863edb4 complete with mandate, roster, and per-turn receipt refs.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met. CLI version runx-cli 0.7.1 satisfies the 0.6.14+ floor and is recorded in observations. GitHub star check passed directly via verifier. Package name is exactly purchase-approval under owner q10283245, public_url is live at runx.ai/x/q10283245/purchase-approval@0.2.0, no secrets in artifacts. PR 307 against runxhq/runx is live; x_yaml and skill_md are raw-fetchable from commit 123f42aa, both HTTP 200 with correct content. All artifacts (evidence_json, verification_json, receipt_ref, report, source_url, x_yaml, skill_md) point to the same 0.2.0 revision. Hosted harness passed 2/2 cases. Dogfood receipt sha256:65deaf... is the post-publish run receipt, verified with valid digest, content-address, and production Ed25519 signature, recorded in evidence_json.dogfood with package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, and harness_cases. X.yaml has one sealed case (480 USD Acme Hosting within budget and policy, decision.approved true, bounded AttenuationRequest ceiling emitted, mock-charge consuming that ceiling through price/challenge/verify/seal/forward) and one needs_agent case (2800 USD against 1200 USD balance and 1500 USD cap, no caller.answers, blocks before budget append or charge, names both overage violations). Output is decision plus AttenuationRequest ceiling when approved, no mint, no runx.operational_proposal.v1. Denial leaves nothing consumable. The removal of current_budget_balance as a caller-supplied field in 0.2.0, replaced by an authoritative data.source read_projection, aligns with the bounty description that the skill reads the budget balance and with the security principle that a caller must not supply its own balance; the projection result is what the skill uses as its balance authority before deciding. Evidence observations cover approval decision and reason, ceiling amount and currency, refused reason with policy violation, both harness case names, and receipt id. Report covers all required fields including install, run, and verify instructions reproducible without private context. Claimant provenance is clean throughout.

human review:Reviewer-run runx verify on the delivered receipt returned valid=true, signature.mode=production (kid purchase-approval-registry-dogfood-020, receipt sha256:65deaf24); public Actions run 29310978965 installs q10283245/purchase-approval@0.2.0 from api.runx.ai and matches the receipt timestamp; X.yaml composes read-budget read_projection, human approval gate, CAS append-budget-event, and a seal-guarded mock charge consumer; PR 307 head equals delivered SHA; registry digest matches; hosted harness 2/2.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All structural gates clear: CLI 0.7.0, GitHub star verified, package name correct, public_url live at https://runx.ai/x/q10283245/csat-recovery@0.2.0, PR 308 live, x_yaml and skill_md raw-fetchable from the PR head commit, hosted harness 2/2 passed, dogfood receipt sha256:62107fb8d14e8e05b013c32fd1e8e54072ee49d8695067048b6b6a1b828981b3 distinct from harness fixture and verified with valid Ed25519 production signature, durable state seam correct (read_projection keyed by customer id, ungated CAS append, readback), credit math grounded (800 seeded, 1200 added within 1800 refundable and 4200 remaining monthly, readback total 2000, remaining 3000), no secrets, two correct harness cases, report covers all required topics. One acceptance bullet is not met: the bounty explicitly requires evidence_json observations to include the chosen play and reason, the credit_ceiling amount, currency, counterparty, and original_receipt_ref, the send_plan content_digest, the remaining monthly credit after the decision, the refused or escalated reason for the unlinked case, and the harness case names. The 9 observations present cover CLI version, harness receipt, dogfood receipt, projection-authority note, ungated append, CAS binding, readback, adapter files, and the no-money constraint. None of the decision-output fields appear in the observations array: chosen_play=credit, credit_ceiling amount=1200 USD counterparty=customer-redacted-17 original_receipt_ref=runx:receipt:sha256:originalcharge, send_plan content_digest=sha256:credit-apology-redacted-v1, remaining_monthly_credit=3000, refused reason for the unlinked case (missing original charge receipt), and the case names csat-recovery-linked-charge-credit and csat-recovery-unlinked-credit-needs-agent are not named explicitly. The data exists elsewhere in the evidence_json but the bounty requires it in observations. To pass: add observations that explicitly state the chosen play and reason, each credit_ceiling field (amount, currency, counterparty, original_receipt_ref), the send_plan content_digest, the remaining monthly credit, the refused/escalated reason for the unlinked case, and both harness case names by name. No other changes needed.

human review:v0.2.0 (csat-recovery@0.2.0) implements the durable-state seam the earlier reject required: the graph composes a data.source read_projection keyed by aggregate_id that produces recovery_projection, the evaluate step is instructed to compute the monthly total from the store projection and never from prior_recovery_ref, and an ungated CAS append_event uses expected_version from that read plus an idempotency_key. Production-signed receipt verified; machine run 20/20. The fabricated-capability blocker is resolved.

machine:Machine checks passed: 20/20. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All acceptance bullets are met with real artifact evidence. CLI: runx-cli 0.7.0 confirmed by machine check, satisfies ≥0.6.14 floor. GitHub star: machine verifier confirmed @q10283245 stars runxhq/runx as of 2026-07-13T02:27:24Z. Package name: exact name purchase-approval used throughout X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence_json, and registry ref. public_url: machine check confirmed HTTP 200 with 42448 bytes; artifact fetch timed out at review time but the machine verifier evidence is authoritative. PR: https://github.com/runxhq/runx/pull/307 live at HTTP 200; x_yaml and skill_md are raw-fetchable from the PR head commit at revision 1d5bff5e5865650aec2eba950e20ed36bc1443a9, both HTTP 200. Version/revision consistency: all artifacts reference version 0.1.0 and source revision 1d5bff5e5865650aec2eba950e20ed36bc1443a9. Harness: two cases in X.yaml - purchase-approval-in-policy-within-budget (sealed, caller.answers present, decision.approved true, bounded 480 USD attenuation_request for Acme Hosting with purchase:hosting scope) and purchase-approval-over-budget-needs-human (no caller.answers, expects needs_agent, 2800 USD exceeds both 1500 cap and 1200 balance). Machine check confirms hosted harness passed 2 cases with 1 receipt. Dogfood block: evidence_json.dogfood contains package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, and harness_cases with sealed/refused status for each named case. receipt_ref is the post-publish dogfood run, not a harness fixture seal. Verification: verification_json shows valid=true, digest valid, content_address valid, production Ed25519 signature valid. receipt_ref matches verification_json.receipt_id. Typed inputs/outputs: X.yaml declares all four required inputs. SKILL.md specifies decision{approved,reason} plus attenuation_request{amount,currency,counterparty,scopes} only when approved, plus escalation. Never a mint, never runx.operational_proposal.v1. Handoff seam: SKILL.md correctly describes the C3 downstream driver pattern; denial leaves nothing consumable. Judgment correctness: approved case passes all bounds; refused case correctly blocks on amount exceeding both cap and balance; skill prohibits inventing policy fields. evidence_json observations: 9 items covering approval decision and reason, emitted ceiling (480 USD), refused reason (budget overage citing cap and balance), both case names, receipt id, CLI version, publisher, package, public_url, pr_url, verification verdict, new-user path. Report: 16 bullets covering all required fields including install command, run command, verify command, and how a new user operates the skill without private context. No secrets in artifacts. Claimant q10283245 is the publishing owner and PR author. The skill has real operational value as a pre-commitment purchase gate in an agentic spend pipeline.

human review:On the contract this passes (typed I/O, human-review gate, production receipt that verifies), but it runs on hand-fed inputs and its ceiling goes nowhere, so it is a pattern demo, not operational value. current_budget_balance is a typed input rather than read from a real budget, and the emitted AttenuationRequest is data that nothing consumes. To be payable as a 5/5 runx skill: read the budget from a real data.source read_projection keyed by cost-center, and make the emitted ceiling consumable by a downstream payment rail (mock-charge or mpp-pay) under a compare-and-set, so an approval actually attenuates and gates real spend and a denial actually blocks it. Then it enforces a budget instead of describing a decision. The decision logic and receipt workflow are already correct and reusable.