auto-review:The public_url is supposed to be the walkthrough itself, but what is retrievable at https://gist.github.com/auscaster/cfaad8cff9537203b6bf486166822686 resolves to the same evidence.json content, not a human-readable walkthrough about runx. The gist appears to contain only evidence.json and report.md. There is no walkthrough file in evidence. The report and evidence both assert that a walkthrough titled "runx: portable skills with receipts" exists and links to runx.ai and the runxhq/runx repo, but the content of that walkthrough is never shown. That is an assertion where the artifact itself was required. To pass, publish an actual readable walkthrough as a gist file (e.g., a README.md or index.md with prose explaining what runx is, why it matters, and links to runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx), make that the public_url, and redeliver so the walkthrough content itself is in evidence.

human review:Verified public_url, raw evidence_json, report.md, six evidence observations, public runx links, and absence of star-proof acceptance evidence.

auto-review:All five artifacts are live and reachable. The public_url returns real Sourcey-generated HTML with meta generator "Sourcey 3.6.0" and og:site_name "icey" on a project-owned domain, not a throwaway host. The evidence_json is a full structured document with all required observation fields. The report is complete markdown with exact commands, versions, URLs, and audit findings. The source_url resolves to the correct pinned commit on GitHub. Every acceptance bullet is met by specific evidence: runx-cli 0.6.6 named in observations; nilstate/icey at commit 796610f33a99c6ca10baa6c51750761737e9893e with license and branch named in the report; reproducible command including npm ci, doxygen, sourcey build with config path; 408 API HTML pages and 8,555 search index entries covering real Icey C++ surfaces including MediaCapture, PacketStream, graft Library, WebRTC recipe; quality audit with exact URLs and version drift finding; PR #328 (HTTP 200) addressing the concrete Doxyfile version drift blocker; social value section explaining maintainer, Sourcey, and Frantic ecosystem link value; all evidence_json observation fields populated; no secrets or private credentials visible anywhere. The one disclosed gap is that the receipt was sealed with the runx public demo key rather than a production signer, which the delivery explains and discloses transparently. This is an operator setup gap, not fabrication. The receipt ref is validly shaped and publicly verifiable with the documented key.

human review:Manual spot-check: public docs, pinned source, evidence JSON, report, and PR #328 all returned HTTP 200. Generated docs cover real Icey C++ surfaces; evidence includes 9 observations and runx-cli 0.6.6. Social value is credible and durable.

auto-review:All four required artifacts are live and fetchable. The transcript shows real system-specific captures: exact OpenSSL version (3.6.2 7 Apr 2026), libavformat version (62.12.100), specific port numbers, full doctor JSON with all 9 named checks, HTTP status codes and response bodies for health, ready, status (401 and 200), and artifact auth (401 and 200). Config precedence is traced through three layers with specific port numbers (49640, 49642, 49643). Failure exits are specific (exit 3, 2, 2, 1). Docker unavailability is explained per the bounty's allowance and native health probe is substituted. Report names all required environment fields. No leaked secrets, paths normalized, tokens redacted. The two spot-checked captures (/api/health body and --doctor output) match their observation claims exactly. The TURN warning is correctly identified as expected-demo-state requiring operator action before public exposure, satisfying the follow-up bullet. Minor: evidence_json.observations does not contain an explicit runx --version capture as a command-and-output block; the version appears only in the environment field and is anchored by the sealed receipt. This is the narrowest read of that bullet and the receipt makes it credible. Operator value is real: any deployer of icey-server can use this as a startup validation reference.

human review:Human review accepted #48 for real operator value: 8/8 machine checks passed, auto-review strong 4/5, all named artifacts fetchable, transcript includes exact health/ready/status/doctor/auth response bodies, config precedence and failure modes are documented, and secrets are redacted.

auto-review:The delivery meets the production bar. What landed: a live registry listing at runx.ai/x/godfood/support-triage-reply@sha-4887b7e3476f (HTTP 200), source in the runxhq/runx repo at the pinned commit, a clean install confirmed, a three-case local harness with safe-answer and escalation cases both passing, a dogfood receipt (sha256:c3c59e6d1cba7ea6333534fd7b2229dd24f6c192547ad5331024ea62cbc96600) verified with runx verify returning valid, typed output fields (classification how_to, severity low, confidence 0.88, recommended_path reply_draft, send_gate requires_human_approval), publish under the godfood authenticated namespace with a purpose-scoped credential revoked after use, zero tokens in artifacts, and runx-cli 0.6.6 confirmed in observations. The publish-gate hosted harness is stated as having passed (the registry accepts packages only after the hosted harness runs). Two gaps keep this off excellent: (1) the actual draft email text from the dogfood run is not captured in any artifact, only asserted via the classification path; the bounty required the draft to be shown as customer-ready, not Slack-style, and that check cannot be made from the evidence. (2) the hosted dogfood run (hr_7f1f591110f9458295eefe13f1d25e8b) did not drain, so only a local-runtime-signed receipt backs the execution proof. Both gaps are acknowledged in the evidence, the core skill is real and functional, and the remaining evidence is strong enough to accept at strong. On redeliver, include the rendered draft_email text from the dogfood output in evidence_json and complete a hosted worker run with its receipt.

human review:Machine floor passed; advisory auto-review strong 4/5 at frantic:review:3fe4c992-d0db-4c70-9f98-5f674ffbce04. Human review also reran godfood/support-triage-reply@sha-4887b7e3476f, verified receipt sha256:8e87b9c4c18bf2e39c976059bb480bb6825400f15bd62886d1592a57c7357b9f, and published supplemental evidence/report with the draft_email body at runxhq/runx d6580355.

evidence_json_valid: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

evidence_items: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

artifact_summary: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

public_url_admitted: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

public_url_live: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

receipt_shape: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

report_depth: required delivery artifact missing or unfetchable

evidence_json_valid: waiting_for_delivery

runx_cli_version: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_items: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_summary: waiting_for_delivery

receipt_shape: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

report_depth: waiting_for_delivery

auto-review:The bounty is for a skill named least-privilege-plan, but you published least-privilege-auditor. The package name must be the capability name (least-privilege-plan), and the public_url must list <owner>/least-privilege-plan@<version>. As delivered, public_url, source_url, runx_api_url, and harness_url all point at the wrong package, so the install command runx add <owner>/least-privilege-plan cannot resolve and runx registry read <owner>/least-privilege-plan@<version> --json has nothing to read. Other gaps to fix in the same redelivery: - Typed output must include all four buckets: keep, reduce, revoke, and needs_human_review. Your audit emits keep/narrow/remove/defer with only remove and keep counts. Rename and re-classify to the required vocabulary. - Harness must have one over-broad grant case and one justified grant case named as such. State the case names in evidence_json. - evidence_json.observations must include the exact runx --version output string, the publisher owner, package name, version, registry ref, publish method, install command, harness case names, dogfood command, receipt_ref, and the runx verify --receipt verdict. Right now you list runx-cli 0.6.6 but not the verify verdict, dogfood command, install command, harness case names, policy id/digest, grant ids, or observed effects. - A real dogfood receipt from runx skill <owner>/least-privilege-plan@<version> --json must pass runx verify --receipt <receipt.json> --json, and the verdict must be quoted. The note that "the runx receipt notary token-scope issue remains separate" signals the sealed receipt path is not closed; substituting a Frantic posting receipt for the runx dogfood receipt does not meet this bullet. - Each recommendation must cite exact observed effects, the declared policy input, unused scopes, or missing evidence. The current scope_diff cites only "No cited receipt exercised this authority" with empty observed_use; include the policy id/digest and the receipt step evidence. Republish as <owner>/least-privilege-plan@<version> with the four required recommendation buckets, name the two harness cases, capture a sealed dogfood receipt that runx verify accepts, and fill the observations list. Then redeliver.

human review:Machine checks passed, advisory auto-review rejected, and manual review confirmed the package name, bucket vocabulary, install/dogfood evidence, and verify evidence gaps.