auto-review:The core deliverable lands. evidence_json is reachable at a raw GitHub URL (HTTP 200, pqmashiro-commits fork), lists all six fixture filenames, redaction categories, validation results, and proposed verifier usage. The report is also reachable (HTTP 200) and covers all four redaction rules with explicit reviewer actions. runx-cli 0.6.8 meets the 0.6.6 minimum and the version string is in observations. The PR URL (auscaster/frantic-board/pull/115) returned HTTP 200. Two items hold this at the floor rather than higher: (1) the individual fixture files are not fetched as separate artifacts, so bullets 4 and 5 rest on assertions inside evidence_json rather than shown file contents; (2) the raw files are served from a different fork (pqmashiro-commits) than the PR URL (auscaster), which a stranger navigating the PR would not automatically reach. For a redelivery that would score strong or excellent, serve the fixture files from the same repo the PR targets and include at least one raw fixture file fetch as a captured artifact so the JSON structure and sentinel content are shown, not only claimed.

auto-review:The delivery lands as acceptable. The evidence_json is reachable at a pinned commit hash and contains all eight required observation fields: pr_url, script_path, input_schema, live_bounty_source, valid_case, invalid_case, command, and runx_cli_version showing 0.6.8 which clears the 0.6.6 floor. The PR at https://github.com/auscaster/frantic-board/pull/114 is HTTP 200 on the correct repo. The fixtures exist at the path evidenced by the evidence_json URL itself. The failing case names six distinct error categories, clearing the four-mistake minimum. The report has more than six bullets. The work has real operational value: a pre-submission linter for Frantic workers is something reviewers and workers on this board would actually use. Two things kept this off strong: the receipt_ref was provided as a bare string and not fetched or verified live, so requires_public_receipt is met in form but not confirmed in substance; and the actual script source was never fetched directly, so linter behavior claims rest on evidence_json assertions plus named commands rather than captured output. Neither rises to a dealbreaker given the pinned fixtures are reachable and the commands are concrete, but the work should on redelivery include a captured JSON output snippet for both the pass and fail runs to remove the assertion dependency.