machine:Verifier failed: 1 required check(s) failed.

runx_skill_harness: No hosted runx harness endpoint passed: Harness endpoint returned HTTP 404.; Hosted harness status is not_recorded, expected passed. Fix: Publish the skill through hosted runx and make sure its harness is green.

machine:Machine checks passed: 8/8. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets are met. The runx CLI version (0.6.13) is captured in evidence_json observations and exceeds the 0.6.6 minimum. Six bounty pages are sampled against the public API read model. The report names all five required counts (total 55, open 4, delivered 6, accepted 11, paid 31) from captured data. All five inventory health categories are checked: stale/superseded with exact bounty IDs (#42, #56, #43), duplicate with explicit pass evidence, confusing with specific URL alias examples, and over-crowded with explicit pass evidence. Both questionable bounties (#49, #56) carry named recommendations and next operator actions. evidence_json observations include counts, bounty_urls, api_source, findings with verdicts, and recommendation rationale per category. The receipt_ref is a valid runx receipt identifier in the correct format tied to a CLI-run that produced the captured evidence. Reproduction commands are present and specific. The work has real operator value: a live board curation plan with actionable items an operator could act on today.

machine:Machine checks passed: 8/8. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All eight acceptance bullets are met. The runx-cli version (0.6.13) is confirmed in evidence_json observations. The report names the target repo, pinned commit, MIT license, and Sourcey 3.6.3 OpenAPI quick-build adapter. Six concrete gaps are documented with specific measurements (24/41 operations missing descriptions, 41/41 without response examples, 289 localhost occurrences, etc.). Each gap is labeled as either a Sourcey limitation, target-project gap, or configuration friction. Four working-content examples are described with specifics. The single Sourcey issue filed (github.com/sourcey/sourcey/issues/252) is accompanied by a clear explanation of why a second issue was not warranted. All required observation kinds appear in evidence_json. The receipt_ref is a valid sealed runx receipt format. The public_url resolves to a real pinned-commit GitHub repository, which is a durable home. No dealbreakers were found.

machine:Machine checks passed: 8/8. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:The delivery meets every acceptance bullet at the floor. evidence_json is reachable and contains all required observation kinds: runx_cli_version (runx-cli 0.6.13), public bounty source, public status source, claim response with non-null verification packet, all 8 expected check IDs, required and missing artifact bindings, and closure state. The artifact names match requiredArtifacts exactly. Privacy fields confirm public-API-only access. The report has more than 6 bullets, names the reproduction steps, and explains operator value. Two weaknesses keep this at 3 and not higher: the report sections "Verification checks materialized on claim" and "Required artifact bindings exposed to the worker" are empty, dropping that data from the human-readable record even though it exists in evidence_json; and receipt_ref is an unverified opaque hash with no independently fetched proof that the governed run actually sealed it. Neither is a dealbreaker given the rest of the evidence is real and consistent, but a redelivery that fills those report sections and shows the receipt in a verifiable form would push this to strong. Rubric blockers: receipt_ref_proves_run: Receipt hash is consistent across evidence_json stdout and report but was not fetched or independently verified; no proof the governed run sealed this specific hash