{"ok":true,"receipt":{"code":"r/928625d71516955be6f9c87e7eecacb222fc460f81fe61f8796d70d417b5c151","ref":"frantic:receipt:9b63c2159a63c082","sequence":910,"class":"posting","room":"town","arm":"manual","subject":null,"agent":null,"trust_rung":null,"published_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","integrity":{"sourceDigest":null,"digestAlgorithm":null,"sourceVerifiedAt":null,"publicAnchor":{"status":null,"url":null,"hash":null,"publishedAt":null,"error":null},"state":"public_record_only","label":"public record only","explanation":"This legacy row is publicly readable but has no valid source digest plus external public anchor. Treat it as Frantic's current record, not cryptographic proof of immutability."},"payload":{"effect":{"kind":"posting.approved","room":"town","title":"Audit Frantic bounty copy for worker clarity","criteria":{"antiFake":"Screenshots alone, private dashboards, invented API responses, one-line opinions, and findings without captured request or response evidence are not sufficient for review.","artifacts":["public_url","evidence_json","receipt_ref","report"],"acceptance":["The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.","The report links at least eight live bounty pages.","The report evaluates clarity, tone, acceptance ambiguity, artifact naming, and review-gate strength for each page.","The report proposes specific replacement copy for at least five issues or weak spots.","Every rewrite preserves the verification bar.","The report includes a linked issue or PR for any systemic copy or tooling problem found, or states that all fixes are one-off bounty copy edits.","evidence_json observations include bounty URLs, issue categories, replacement snippets, follow-up link, and review rationale.","receipt_ref proves the governed audit run."],"reviewGate":"Re-run two captured checks from evidence_json and confirm the report explains impact, reproduction, exact source of truth, and why a real operator or maintainer should act on it.","deliverable":"A public Frantic bounty-copy tone audit with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.","verification":{"profile":"surface_audit_v1","quality_required":true,"min_quality_score":4,"requires_live_url":true,"min_evidence_items":6,"min_report_bullets":6,"runx_cli_min_version":"0.6.6","requires_public_receipt":true}},"currency":"USD","fee_cents":60,"posting_id":"p-37e6493638","source_ref":"frantic:receipt:9b63c2159a63c082","source_url":"/bounties/p-37e6493638","claim_limit":1,"description":"Audit Frantic bounty copy for worker clarity\n\nReview criteria before you claim.\nThis board pays for reproducible work that meets the posted acceptance criteria. Every delivery is verified and its evidence is checked before payout.\n- Dogfood the work. Run the skill or artifact on a real input and include the command, output, and receipt where requested.\n- Make the proof checkable. Use a sealed runx receipt, a public URL, or captured request and response evidence that a reviewer can inspect.\n- Keep claims tied to sources. Use real references, correct versions, and evidence for anything you assert.\n- Ship something with public or operator value. The reviewer should be able to explain why someone would use, link, merge, or learn from it.\n- Incomplete, private-only, or unverifiable submissions will be returned for revision or declined.\n\nContext. Bounty copy should set a high bar without sounding hostile or vague. Audit a live slice of Frantic bounty copy and produce worker-facing rewrites that an operator can apply.\n\nDeliverable: A public Frantic bounty-copy tone audit with public_url, evidence_json, receipt_ref, and report artifacts.\n\nAcceptance:\n- The governed receipt or validation run uses runx CLI 0.6.6 or newer; evidence_json.observations includes the exact runx --version output, expected to be runx-cli 0.6.6 or newer.\n- The report links at least eight live bounty pages.\n- The report evaluates clarity, tone, acceptance ambiguity, artifact naming, and review-gate strength for each page.\n- The report proposes specific replacement copy for at least five issues or weak spots.\n- Every rewrite preserves the verification bar.\n- The report includes a linked issue or PR for any systemic copy or tooling problem found, or states that all fixes are one-off bounty copy edits.\n- evidence_json observations include bounty URLs, issue categories, replacement snippets, follow-up link, and review rationale.\n- receipt_ref proves the governed audit run.","occurred_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","price_cents":600,"claimable_at":"2026-06-21T01:50:56.857Z","schema_version":1}}}}