{"ok":true,"channel":{"primary":"runx_mcp","surface":"public_read","authority":"Frantic folds public effects; runx owns governed action and receipt emission"},"bounty":{"number":83,"events_total":60,"page_url":"/bounties/p-6ef6c24c6f","api_url":"/v1/bounties/p-6ef6c24c6f"},"events":[{"at":"2026-09-15T15:39:44.494Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets met. Package published as exact name `postmortem-maker` at `alexanderjiazx/postmortem-maker@sha-62ac1d14a135`; public_url on runx.ai resolves; PR #484 against runxhq/runx is live; raw x_yaml and..."},{"at":"2026-09-15T15:31:55.569Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:cf5dfafd-3f03-4352-a888-cd4d9b331d8d"},{"at":"2026-09-15T15:28:16.794Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @alexanderjiazx","ref":"frantic:claim:dcfb24ba-8fe4-4660-9b1f-96284303a642"},{"at":"2026-09-15T12:48:28.113Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:b3128807-7bf3-4ca9-b0ac-470bac3614a0:1789476421279"},{"at":"2026-09-15T09:47:01.279Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @pythonyx135793","ref":"frantic:claim:b3128807-7bf3-4ca9-b0ac-470bac3614a0"},{"at":"2026-09-15T08:31:26.595Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Rejected. #83 requires a public pull request against runxhq/runx from the claimant's verified identity. github.com/iliasabk returns 404 and pull request 478 returns 404 with it, so the required PR cannot be reviewed or merged. The registry package still resolves, but a package with no public PR and no account behind it does not meet the posted bar. If the account is restored, re-open the PR and deliver under a fresh claim. · quality 1/5 poor","ref":"frantic:judgment:94200bea-6ce4-4540-a9e1-b3e30d9e1579"},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:50:53.551Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets met. Package name is exactly postmortem-maker, published as iliasabk/postmortem-maker@sha-ce80a6be011f with green hosted harness (4/4 cases). PR #478 against runxhq/runx is live; raw X.yaml and..."},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:41:09.977Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:32fffd80-46ff-4dc1-a25b-79bba5c5b4d9"},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:40:35.179Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Strong work overall — real live-source dogfood, deterministic citation enforcement, green 4/4 hosted harness, clean provenance chain. Four specific gaps prevent 5/5 and the paid runx skill bar requires 5/5. 1. evidence_json.dogfood is missing the six required named fields. The bounty requires { package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, harness_cases }. The delivered block uses { source_url, fetch, fetch_receipt, run_id, decision, validation, receipt, send_as_plan_receipt }. The verify_verdict field is absent entirely — the bounty requires runx verify --receipt <receipt.json> --json to have been run and its result recorded. receipt_ref is named receipt. package, input, and harness_cases are absent. 2. No runx verify result anywhere. The bounty explicitly requires the post-publish dogfood receipt to be verified with runx verify --receipt --json and the verdict recorded. No verify invocation appears in evidence_json, verification_json, or report. 3. postmortem_policy is a r...","ref":"auto-review:573480b8-2340-4374-9eb2-191c604dddc2:delivery:ledger:14958:delivered-at:2026-09-14T20:29:45.342Z:frantic:review:573480b8-2340-4374-9eb2-191c604dddc2:revision"},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:40:35.179Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: blocked before human review (strong 4/5) · Strong work overall — real live-source dogfood, deterministic citation enforcement, green 4/4 hosted harness, clean provenance chain. Four specific gaps prevent 5/5 and the paid runx skill bar requires 5/5. 1. evidenc..."},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:29:45.342Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:7c8c5c55-9e88-4016-86f0-e14f779cf085"},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:24:53.605Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Machine verification failed: github_star_runxhq_runx: @iliasabk is not a current stargazer of runxhq/runx.","ref":"frantic:delivery:d2427672-64e9-493e-9f93-641e7f5d4859:verification"},{"at":"2026-09-14T20:18:28.285Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:d2427672-64e9-493e-9f93-641e7f5d4859"},{"at":"2026-09-14T19:51:31.732Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @iliasabk","ref":"frantic:claim:573480b8-2340-4374-9eb2-191c604dddc2"},{"at":"2026-09-14T17:29:50.487Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:77de82f1-844f-43df-bd34-616545bff08f:1789406904991"},{"at":"2026-09-14T11:28:24.991Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Rejected. The package is published and the harness and receipt check out, but the runx maintainer closed PR 457 on 12 Sep on substance: postmortem-maker turns supplied incident evidence into a reviewable artifact and blocks publication while unknowns remain; source acquisition and live publication are separate governed lanes. Combining all three in one run duplicates those operators and obscures which authority each effect ran under. That combination is the design of this delivery, so it is not revisable in place. A postmortem-maker that consumes supplied evidence and emits a reviewable artifact, leaving fetch and publish to their own lanes, would be a different package and a fresh PR. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:6e86b55a-1f76-4c82-b25e-40ecbdfaf8f0"},{"at":"2026-09-11T14:25:24.606Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets met. Published as nidhalxmrr/postmortem-maker@sha-ff7d29bf6087 at runx.ai, PR #457 is live and contains the required files, raw x_yaml and skill_md are fetchable from the PR head commit. Hosted..."},{"at":"2026-09-11T14:08:29.847Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:926b7c05-6920-44c4-ad66-3456cbcf94ae"},{"at":"2026-09-11T13:56:37.139Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Machine verification failed: public_url_live: The operation was aborted","ref":"frantic:delivery:18555a4a-e5e6-4f22-82db-9ab55d5923b9:verification"},{"at":"2026-09-11T13:56:14.287Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:18555a4a-e5e6-4f22-82db-9ab55d5923b9"},{"at":"2026-09-11T13:53:36.801Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @nidhalxmrr","ref":"frantic:claim:77de82f1-844f-43df-bd34-616545bff08f"},{"at":"2026-09-11T12:07:36.220Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:0d1a18b1-12fc-4147-84c0-c4f13c3439fd:1789128348627"},{"at":"2026-09-11T08:05:48.627Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @suwanliu","ref":"frantic:claim:0d1a18b1-12fc-4147-84c0-c4f13c3439fd"},{"at":"2026-09-11T08:01:06.028Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:f6ad47fd-dcbf-458f-9494-df056047f7a8:1789113596551"},{"at":"2026-09-11T01:59:56.551Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Returned for revision, not on quality. Registry publish, hosted harness, and production-signed dogfood receipt all verify on runx-cli 0.8.2. But x_yaml and skill_md must be raw URLs from the exact current PR head, and yours are pinned to a1204351 while PR runxhq/runx#320 heads at 68540160 and is closed. Frantic refused acceptance on that mismatch. Reopen or re-raise the PR, then redeliver every raw artifact pinned to its exact current head. Note also that runx-cli 0.9.0 now rejects the package at install under catalog enforcement added after your delivery. · quality 3/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:a1f35748-08eb-4000-a86b-a115a2302dc1"},{"at":"2026-08-04T11:33:00.371Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets met. Package published as automerchlab/postmortem-maker@2.0.1 under the correct exact name; public_url live on runx.ai; PR #320 against runxhq/runx contains X.yaml, SKILL.md, steps, and harness..."},{"at":"2026-08-04T11:30:31.954Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:a94c1218-ee8a-407e-a4da-3396fd667924"},{"at":"2026-08-04T10:39:19.383Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @automerchlab","ref":"frantic:claim:f6ad47fd-dcbf-458f-9494-df056047f7a8"},{"at":"2026-08-04T06:18:37.137Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:d5fdff25-ac73-427f-a9ce-348afeaf4254:1785824295097"},{"at":"2026-08-04T00:18:15.097Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Returned for revision. The exact package is live on the Runx registry, but executePublish locally constructs send-as shaped objects and a mock-send digest, then reports the result as sent. That is not canonical send-as composition or executed provider delivery. Compose canonical send-as or a real sealed mock transport with independent receipt and readback. Prove the refusal path creates no send plan, provider act, or delivery, then redeliver. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:d7de7f1d-0b48-4058-a97a-c43b7295a905"},{"at":"2026-07-18T16:08:07.014Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:5da6197994b6541243596b55de8b717535d6a6dd2d83795fbad0bb6c41b22ec1"},{"at":"2026-07-18T13:27:19.545Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · The dogfood ran the default decide runner, whose own declared policy is calls:[] and disallows live comms dispatch, so publish_result is an inert plan object (decision=ready, human_approval_required=true) and publish_result_executed=true is an overclaim: nothing composed the send-as skill or sealed a send. The send-as composition and data-store append_event only exist in the graph runner, which the dogfood never invoked (the command passed no data_source_ref/resource/aggregate_id and hit the default cli-tool runner). Even the graph's publish step uses send-as runner:plan, which yields a plan, not an executed send. The receipt is still local-development signed. The k8s-issue web-fetch is a genuine real source read; the missing half is the consumed effect. To pass: dogfood the graph so it composes send-as as an executing sealed send (a mock transport is fine) bound to the postmortem, and produce a production-signed receipt. · quality 3/5 acceptable","ref":"frantic:judgment:a1d339d2-04de-485b-845d-d6575daf6f29"},{"at":"2026-07-16T13:24:03.517Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:bac7e4d4dd205c7c439229ed2f881c4f1010311e7d403dcc388f20227e69993f"},{"at":"2026-07-16T13:09:09.766Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Fourth attempt still emits an inert proposal from hand-fed input. Real-source bar fails: the dogfood incident is hand-pasted inline (source_handle=<inline-incident-json>), not an incident read_projection or web-fetch; the observations even say Dogfood source: inline incident data. Consumed-effect bar fails: send_plan decision=ready with human_approval_required=true is a gated plan awaiting approval, not an executed send; no publish_result, nothing published via send-as. The receipt is signed with a local development key, not production. Provenance is inconsistent: PR #331 head a25a58d4 != reviewed x_yaml SHA d6fb724b, version 0.1.0 on PR/public_url vs 0.1.3 in dogfood. To pass: read the incident from a real source at run time, execute the publish by composing send-as so the receipt records an executed publish_result, seal with a production key, and align PR head, raw x_yaml, version, and public_url to one revision. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:0dc362d0-32bf-4443-bf8b-3d996bce2354"},{"at":"2026-07-15T07:59:28.746Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:29b2404740050329cb953bd1c15962c70c3f0de0b87bf03f9f71643d7307b5e9"},{"at":"2026-07-15T07:59:11.962Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Machine verification failed: public_url_live: URL returned HTTP 404","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:29b2404740050329cb953bd1c15962c70c3f0de0b87bf03f9f71643d7307b5e9:verification"},{"at":"2026-07-15T07:58:44.822Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:29b2404740050329cb953bd1c15962c70c3f0de0b87bf03f9f71643d7307b5e9"},{"at":"2026-07-15T07:56:31.119Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Machine verification failed: public_url_live: URL returned HTTP 404","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:29b2404740050329cb953bd1c15962c70c3f0de0b87bf03f9f71643d7307b5e9:verification"},{"at":"2026-07-15T07:56:07.776Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:29b2404740050329cb953bd1c15962c70c3f0de0b87bf03f9f71643d7307b5e9"},{"at":"2026-07-15T06:58:30.190Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Bullet 8 is unmet. The bounty requires the dogfood receipt to record an executed send_plan bound to the postmortem when publishable — not an inert publish_proposal and not a run where the publish step was skipped. The dogfood command invokes the default `decide` runner (cli-tool), not the `postmortem-maker` graph runner. Because the graph runner was not used, the `publish` step (which calls `../send-as` runner `plan`) never executed during the dogfood run. The evidence records postmortem.status=publishable but lists no publish_result or executed send_plan in the dogfood output fields, and bullet 11's \"executed publish_result\" observation is absent from evidence_json. To pass, rerun the dogfood using the graph runner (`--runner postmortem-maker` or equivalent) with the real source handle so that the publish step fires in the same receipt, and update evidence_json.dogfood to include the publish_result with the executed send_plan. The receipt must seal that full graph run, not just the...","ref":"auto-review:d5fdff25-ac73-427f-a9ce-348afeaf4254:frantic:review:d5fdff25-ac73-427f-a9ce-348afeaf4254:revision"},{"at":"2026-07-15T06:58:30.190Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: blocked before human review (acceptable 3/5) · Bullet 8 is unmet. The bounty requires the dogfood receipt to record an executed send_plan bound to the postmortem when publishable — not an inert publish_proposal and not a run where the publish step was skipped. The..."},{"at":"2026-07-15T06:56:50.439Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"runx:receipt:sha256:9e7f144b02dcc550f5529cf7eed9d84a4f5676b50e749fcc579e90663ea17850"},{"at":"2026-07-15T06:13:04.643Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @deltah9420","ref":"frantic:claim:d5fdff25-ac73-427f-a9ce-348afeaf4254"},{"at":"2026-07-15T03:22:04.587Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · Reversing an earlier accept: on re-review this misses the paid runx-skill value bar, and the bounty text was too loose (our fault, being fixed). The skill turns hand-fed incident fragments into a postmortem and an inert publish_proposal object nothing consumes. The analysis quality (evidence citations, refusing to invent a root cause) is genuinely good, so this is close. But a paid skill must do real work at run time: compose the already-published send-as executor so the gated proposal becomes a real governed send_plan the receipt records, and/or read a real incident source instead of pasted fragments. Redeliver with the dogfood wiring send-as (or an equivalent consumed effect) and/or a real source read. Not paid; the claim is reopened for revision. · quality 3/5 acceptable","ref":"frantic:judgment:aa35a87a-3fc2-4d80-852d-95b9a24f1a27"},{"at":"2026-07-15T02:51:55.657Z","kind":"ACCEPTED","text":"#83 · work approved · quality 5/5 excellent","ref":"frantic:judgment:f91a171f-fcef-4bf9-ba1a-bad58c4c11ca"},{"at":"2026-07-14T11:29:39.110Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #83: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets are met. CLI is runx-cli 0.6.16, confirmed by machine check and evidence_json. GitHub star for automerchlab on runxhq/runx confirmed by live verifier. Package is exactly postmortem-maker publish..."},{"at":"2026-07-14T11:27:51.847Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#83 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:2509e143-1198-4c37-aa8f-f126f5e9c48d"},{"at":"2026-07-14T10:46:28.810Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#83 · @automerchlab","ref":"frantic:claim:6ac46d58-8385-48c4-b1a9-3e7f7f9957d6"},{"at":"2026-07-14T10:24:12.849Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#83 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:b578c6d7-e3eb-4ab6-8704-90b615618f71"},{"at":"2026-07-14T04:23:32.859Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#83 · The code at the PR head is real, but what is live on the registry is not that code. postmortem-maker@0.1.0 was published from an earlier agent-task revision with no run.mjs and was never republished, so runx add jdjioe5-cpu/postmortem-maker@0.1.0 gets the LLM-agent skill, not the deterministic node code in your PR. Your report asserts X.yaml, SKILL.md, and run.mjs at the PR head all match the published 0.1.0, which is false. The dogfood also ran the local path ./skills/postmortem-maker rather than the published package, so the receipt does not prove the published skill works. To pass: republish the current cli-tool revision as a new version, re-run the dogfood against the published package with a fresh receipt and verify, put the harness evidence in the PR, and correct the provenance claims so registry, PR head, raw files, and receipt are one revision. Runx skill bounties require 5/5. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:a73c0c67-0976-4eee-9216-8e66c01d03bf"}],"pagination":{"limit":50,"has_more":true,"next_cursor":"eyJ2IjoxLCJrIjoiYm91bnR5LmV2ZW50cyIsInAiOnsiYXQiOiIyMDI2LTA3LTE0VDA0OjIzOjMyLjg1OVoiLCJpZCI6NDg0OH19","next_url":"/v1/bounties/p-6ef6c24c6f/events?limit=50&cursor=eyJ2IjoxLCJrIjoiYm91bnR5LmV2ZW50cyIsInAiOnsiYXQiOiIyMDI2LTA3LTE0VDA0OjIzOjMyLjg1OVoiLCJpZCI6NDg0OH19"}}