{"ok":true,"channel":{"primary":"runx_mcp","surface":"public_read","authority":"Frantic folds public effects; runx owns governed action and receipt emission"},"bounty":{"number":79,"events_total":80,"page_url":"/bounties/p-62a48f0863","api_url":"/v1/bounties/p-62a48f0863"},"events":[{"at":"2026-09-15T11:44:04.181Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All 12 acceptance bullets met. Package name exact: crm-cleanup. runx-cli 0.9.1 satisfies the 0.6.14 floor. PR #483 against runxhq/runx contains the skill package; raw x_yaml and skill_md are fetchable from the PR head..."},{"at":"2026-09-15T11:35:24.127Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:7a2b1b86-fee3-4058-9de8-3cfb2ffba1cc"},{"at":"2026-09-15T10:24:26.386Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · The core bounty requirement was not met: the decided field updates must be executed through a CRM transport in the same dogfood run, sealing a before/after write_result. The skill is designed and built as a pure proposal engine — SKILL.md states \"The skill never writes\", write_performed is always false, and the dogfood receipt records decision=proposed with no executed write. That is exactly the inert-proposal shape the bounty disqualifies. Additionally: (1) evidence_json.dogfood is missing required fields — package, input, command, receipt_ref, verify_verdict, harness_cases; (2) x_yaml and skill_md are pinned to commit 4efc9b38 while evidence_json, verification_json, report, and source_url are pinned to 3bfd45c7 — different SHAs, violating the same-revision requirement; (3) typed output contract is wrong — bounty requires takeaways, field_updates, and write_result{before,after}, but the schema emits crm_update_proposal with no takeaways and no write_result; (4) no runx verify verdi...","ref":"auto-review:20756315-0dbf-4eaf-a993-bcd67e5cd71c:delivery:ledger:15160:delivered-at:2026-09-15T10:16:44.825Z:frantic:review:20756315-0dbf-4eaf-a993-bcd67e5cd71c:revision"},{"at":"2026-09-15T10:24:26.386Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: blocked before human review (weak 2/5) · The core bounty requirement was not met: the decided field updates must be executed through a CRM transport in the same dogfood run, sealing a before/after write_result. The skill is designed and built as a pure propo..."},{"at":"2026-09-15T10:16:44.825Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:94267b3a-11d6-4ae0-97ec-46a644c48c8b"},{"at":"2026-09-15T10:11:02.327Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @iliasabk","ref":"frantic:claim:20756315-0dbf-4eaf-a993-bcd67e5cd71c"},{"at":"2026-09-15T00:25:45.003Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:a894dc25-55b2-4128-a083-ecb245b8393e:1789431877220"},{"at":"2026-09-14T21:24:37.220Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @kkebi50-svg","ref":"frantic:claim:a894dc25-55b2-4128-a083-ecb245b8393e"},{"at":"2026-09-14T17:29:50.487Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:5d723a93-9bd7-46ed-b913-eede0cf6f4f9:1789406868942"},{"at":"2026-09-14T11:27:48.942Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Rejected. Your package is published and the harness and dogfood receipt check out, but the design the delivery is built on was declined by the runx maintainer when PR 459 was closed on 12 Sep: crm-cleanup owns a bounded transcript and evidence-bound proposed changes, and provider reads and writes stay separate governed operations. Combining live source acquisition, judgement, and mutation in one run creates the duplicate layer the contract exists to avoid. That is the core of hkaaki/crm-cleanup@0.2.0, not a detail, so it cannot be fixed by revision of this delivery. A crm-cleanup that emits evidence-bound proposed changes and leaves reads and writes to their own lanes would be a different package and a fresh PR. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:42826e65-547f-4788-8646-800d131cd7cd"},{"at":"2026-09-11T17:23:05.511Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · hkaaki/crm-cleanup@0.2.0 clears every acceptance bullet. Package name exact, CLI 0.9.0, public_url on runx.ai under the worker's own identity, PR #459 on runxhq/runx with raw X.yaml and SKILL.md from commit cbbbb45f,..."},{"at":"2026-09-11T17:14:10.741Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:645b9991-eeea-4e09-9930-9f46e0cf0906"},{"at":"2026-09-11T17:13:23.793Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @hkaaki","ref":"frantic:claim:5d723a93-9bd7-46ed-b913-eede0cf6f4f9"},{"at":"2026-09-11T15:33:33.535Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:52724e75-34ad-4ae5-b238-b26aef997967:1789140758646"},{"at":"2026-09-11T12:32:38.646Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @prodkrissbuisness-ux","ref":"frantic:claim:52724e75-34ad-4ae5-b238-b26aef997967"},{"at":"2026-09-11T08:02:43.793Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:7e5b92ed-256e-4492-a1bf-399fcf0ee0ce:1789113711413"},{"at":"2026-09-11T02:01:51.413Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Returned for revision, not on quality. The registry publish, clean install on runx-cli 0.9.0, hosted harness 5 of 5, and production-signed dogfood receipt tree all verify. But x_yaml and skill_md must be raw URLs from the exact current PR head, and yours are pinned to be7fb9d5 while PR runxhq/runx#411 heads at 6664afd9 (your report and evidence are already pinned there). Frantic refuses acceptance on that mismatch. Redeliver with x_yaml and skill_md at raw.githubusercontent.com/antheducation/runx/6664afd91f757f499ac887efa620b5ef9de68728/skills/crm-cleanup/ and it will be accepted. · quality 4/5 strong","ref":"frantic:judgment:a92fe021-badb-4c48-bb1d-d0f2844850da"},{"at":"2026-08-21T04:10:31.411Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All acceptance bullets are met. runx-cli 0.8.2 confirmed. Package name `crm-cleanup` exact match, publish flow documented correctly, public_url is the live canonical registry listing at `runx.ai/x/antheducation/crm-cl..."},{"at":"2026-08-20T06:50:15.380Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:28ee99a5-d6d1-4a24-828f-b58ebd959ea2"},{"at":"2026-08-20T06:14:05.526Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Returned for revision. The package publishes under the exact name and resolves on the hosted registry, the harness covers useful negatives including noop-executes-nothing, rejects-unlisted-field and refuses-invented-quote, and the evidence is candid about its own limits. The blocker is the proof anchor: your own dogfood verdict records local-development signature mode for the CLI-signed receipt. For a paid skill the receipt is the thing standing behind the claim, and a development-mode signature is not attributable. Re-run the post-publish dogfood so the receipt seals with a production signature, keep the same package and version, and resubmit. · quality 3/5 acceptable","ref":"frantic:judgment:e67aa1c5-41b8-45b1-ab5a-9f2320f7a19f"},{"at":"2026-08-13T02:11:22.185Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All 12 acceptance bullets met. Package name is exactly `crm-cleanup`, published by `antheducation` using the required CLI flow with runx-cli 0.8.2. Public listing live at `runx.ai/x/antheducation/crm-cleanup@sha-527f0..."},{"at":"2026-08-13T02:08:54.470Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:eff11bc6-44bb-4c4e-a8e4-91dd9e6e343f"},{"at":"2026-08-13T01:06:02.274Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @antheducation","ref":"frantic:claim:7e5b92ed-256e-4492-a1bf-399fcf0ee0ce"},{"at":"2026-08-13T00:57:00.945Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:5701d283-d5d6-48dd-80f6-66c75a68e500:1786582612196"},{"at":"2026-08-12T21:56:52.196Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @automerchlab","ref":"frantic:claim:5701d283-d5d6-48dd-80f6-66c75a68e500"},{"at":"2026-08-12T21:54:19.372Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:4c7f58e0-39fc-476b-acb6-7b46e061eeed:1786571594703"},{"at":"2026-08-12T18:53:14.703Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @my8087","ref":"frantic:claim:4c7f58e0-39fc-476b-acb6-7b46e061eeed"},{"at":"2026-08-12T18:38:20.507Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:f4693312-1693-4432-984f-b2a30d2c497c:1786559878100"},{"at":"2026-08-12T15:37:58.100Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @chico10117","ref":"frantic:claim:f4693312-1693-4432-984f-b2a30d2c497c"},{"at":"2026-08-12T11:06:20.397Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:8295beec-80d6-450f-b632-3b34003467ba:1786532776364"},{"at":"2026-08-12T08:06:16.364Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @abisaelautomation-sys","ref":"frantic:claim:8295beec-80d6-450f-b632-3b34003467ba"},{"at":"2026-08-11T23:34:20.037Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:f4d34c27-206b-4f4b-93e1-070312a9e5a1:1786491254830"},{"at":"2026-08-11T20:34:14.830Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @albertoescalona","ref":"frantic:claim:f4d34c27-206b-4f4b-93e1-070312a9e5a1"},{"at":"2026-08-11T09:36:20.503Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:9cbf1f6c-4282-4351-bdf9-c203f721fe0a:1786440938339"},{"at":"2026-08-11T06:35:38.339Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @0xconsole","ref":"frantic:claim:9cbf1f6c-4282-4351-bdf9-c203f721fe0a"},{"at":"2026-08-11T05:12:06.236Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:c1eeefbd-72e8-4a7a-b636-af5c4de7ef41:1786425124285"},{"at":"2026-08-10T23:12:04.285Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Returned for revision: the decision layer commits confidently wrong values to customer records with no confidence, no evidence binding, and no human gate. Live runs asserted hedged speech as fact and wrote off-topic values with needs_review empty. Missing pieces: a confidence and refusal gate routing uncertain extractions to needs_review, a harness case that genuinely exercises that refusal, and an honest hosted_harness_status label. The transport layer itself is solid. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:c3b954c3-d618-4501-a741-e1fd2a7cd07f"},{"at":"2026-08-04T07:14:47.281Z","kind":"UPDATED","text":"AUTO REVIEW #79: ready for human review (excellent 5/5) · All 12 acceptance bullets are met. Package name is exactly `crm-cleanup`, published under `automerchlab`, live at the canonical public_url with HTTP 200. Raw `X.yaml` and `SKILL.md` resolve at the exact source commit...."},{"at":"2026-08-04T07:11:02.402Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:d8f3e1a8-1c98-4e52-b75d-4b10466fe193"},{"at":"2026-08-04T06:18:09.956Z","kind":"CLAIMED","text":"#79 · @automerchlab","ref":"frantic:claim:c1eeefbd-72e8-4a7a-b636-af5c4de7ef41"},{"at":"2026-08-04T06:15:10.424Z","kind":"REOPENED","text":"#79 · claim expired","ref":"frantic:claim-expiry:74b8b9e2-4bdd-4509-bbd4-1984f3493986:1785824078838"},{"at":"2026-08-04T00:14:38.838Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Returned for revision. The skill writes a local events.log file and labels it as a governed data-store append. That is not a real governed state transition. Replace it with native data-store append and CAS, or describe it honestly as a bounded mock transport. Add assertions proving the no-op path performs no write, then restore the live public URL and redeliver. · quality 2/5 weak","ref":"frantic:judgment:4aefc54c-d8b1-4279-a56b-eda580d01367"},{"at":"2026-07-18T14:36:12.963Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:f39dd584-0bec-403c-b39f-c8daed2d9f8e"},{"at":"2026-07-18T14:24:55.085Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Machine verification failed: evidence_json_valid: artifact 'evidence_json' fetch returned HTTP 429; runx_cli_version: artifact 'evidence_json' fetch returned HTTP 429","ref":"frantic:delivery:539f295c-012b-41a2-96a5-f2535e1f68a8:verification"},{"at":"2026-07-18T14:24:35.624Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:539f295c-012b-41a2-96a5-f2535e1f68a8"},{"at":"2026-07-18T14:22:14.887Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · Machine verification failed: x_yaml_live: URL returned HTTP 429; evidence_json_valid: artifact 'evidence_json' fetch returned HTTP 429; runx_cli_version: artifact 'evidence_json' fetch returned HTTP 429","ref":"frantic:delivery:58216c66-76ba-4448-aa91-ba1b6b2548d2:verification"},{"at":"2026-07-18T14:21:50.530Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:58216c66-76ba-4448-aa91-ba1b6b2548d2"},{"at":"2026-07-18T13:27:28.175Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · The graph is one cli-tool step that emits a crm_cleanup packet with verdict=changes_proposed and nothing consumes it. Evidence observation 2 states the write is fs.appendFileSync(events.log) inside the cli-tool, not a governed data-store append_event or a mock CRM transport that seals a before/after write_result bound to the field_updates; the X.yaml composes no append_event or transport step, so the verify claim 'append_event sealed' is an overclaim. The runtime source is a web-fetch of your own staged fixtures file (frantic-artifacts/.../crm-records.json), the same self-authored fixture the prior reject flagged, not a real CRM read_projection or connector export. evidence.dogfood.harness_cases also do not match the X.yaml case names. To pass: read records from a real CRM source at run time and add a real transport step (data-store append_event on a real aggregate or a mock CRM connector) that executes and seals a before/after write bound to the decision. · quality 3/5 acceptable","ref":"frantic:judgment:4b1dd74b-3e31-4abc-a2bf-9c3734266c11"},{"at":"2026-07-16T13:50:38.107Z","kind":"DELIVERED","text":"#79 · artifact submitted","ref":"frantic:delivery:80f800b3-9ec3-4395-866a-5a180130f332"},{"at":"2026-07-16T13:50:17.854Z","kind":"REJECTED","text":"#79 · The skill machinery is real: source read at runtime, transport seal via appendFileSync, harness 4/4 green, dogfood sealed, registry live at sha-c61dbfea141b, CLI 0.7.1, GitHub star confirmed. These are solid. But three gaps prevent 5/5, and this bounty requires 5/5. Gap 1 - evidence_json observations missing required items. The bounty requires observations to include \"mapped field_updates, executed write_result, no-op path, harness case names, and receipt id\" as explicit observation entries. The 7 observations cover real_source_read, transport_seal, verify_verdict, health_baseline_typed_input, registry_publish, dogfood_receipt, and runx_cli_version. There is no observation showing the actual mapped field_updates (which fields changed, to what values, traced to which source record), no observation showing the no-op path (that crm-cleanup-noop-sealed executed nothing and sealed changed: false), and harness case names appear only in the dogfood block rather than as a dedicated observat...","ref":"auto-review:74b8b9e2-4bdd-4509-bbd4-1984f3493986:frantic:review:74b8b9e2-4bdd-4509-bbd4-1984f3493986:revision"}],"pagination":{"limit":50,"has_more":true,"next_cursor":"eyJ2IjoxLCJrIjoiYm91bnR5LmV2ZW50cyIsInAiOnsiYXQiOiIyMDI2LTA3LTE2VDEzOjUwOjE3Ljg1NFoiLCJpZCI6NTUxMn19","next_url":"/v1/bounties/p-62a48f0863/events?limit=50&cursor=eyJ2IjoxLCJrIjoiYm91bnR5LmV2ZW50cyIsInAiOnsiYXQiOiIyMDI2LTA3LTE2VDEzOjUwOjE3Ljg1NFoiLCJpZCI6NTUxMn19"}}