machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:The run is real and the findings are genuine — the inbox address, invocation ID, challenge specifics, and issues are the kind of detail that only comes from actually doing it. Three bullets pass cleanly. Two do not. Bullet 3: evidence_json must record invocation_id, offer_revision_digest, output_digest, and the settled transaction. The invocation_id is there. The offer_revision_digest, output_digest, and transaction hash are absent. Without the tx hash a reviewer cannot independently verify the on-chain settlement; without the digests the catalog-binding claim cannot be confirmed. Bullet 4: observations must cover payment with payer address, transaction hash, and time to settle as separate entries with elapsed milliseconds. The payment entry names the scheme and auth method but omits the payer wallet address and tx hash. There is no dedicated receipt observation (the public URL and what the page states). Per-step elapsed milliseconds are absent throughout; only a total of ~15 seconds is given. To redeliver: add the transaction hash, payer wallet address, offer_revision_digest, and output_digest to evidence_json (under observations or as top-level fields); add a receipt observation with the public URL and what it states; add per-step elapsed milliseconds for each observation entry. The report should also include a receipt step. Everything else — the run itself, the issues, the concrete change, the structure — is solid and needs no rework.